Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3
The Limits of Endurance
A handful of relatively small ocean desalination plants exist in
California, but the state's Coastal Commission is reviewing another 20
proposed projects on a case-by-case basis in an attempt to find a
standard for acceptable impact. Most of the proposed operations have
drawn fire from environmental groups for their potential to harm coastal
ecosystems.
A Poseidon project in Carlsbad, Calif. has come the farthest
in the permitting process and could set the bar for the other proposed
projects, said Jenkins. In Carlsbad and Huntington Beach, Calif.,
Poseidon has proposed building desalination facilities on the grounds of
existing power plants, using a fraction of the seawater used by the
plants for cooling as source water for the reverse osmosis process, while the
remainder is used to dilute the concentrated saltwater before it
returns to the ocean. Each project would produce 50 million gallons
of drinking water per day, enough to serve 300,000 people.
It takes about five parts of unaltered seawater to bring one part of
hypersaline water to a concentration of 40 parts per thousand. In
Carlsbad, Poseidon would build its plant on the grounds of the
Encina Power Station, which uses as much as 800 million gallons of
seawater a day. Presently, permits issued to the power station
regulate consumption of that seawater. Poseidon must plan, however,
for a future beyond Encina's possible decommissioning when the
environmental responsibility for seawater consumption would be
entirely on the desalination plant.
It has been Graham's role as an advisor to the Poseidon projects to
determine what salinity fishes, marine invertebrates, and plants can
tolerate. Jenkins has been tasked with determining how long the
brine discharged from the desalination plant remains concentrated
after it returns to the ocean, a process that requires him to model
winds, currents, and other physical factors to determine how the
hypersaline plume will disperse. His models have suggested that
salinity levels in the brine plume would be within 10 percent of
natural background salinity in less than 1,000 feet of the discharge
channel when flowing at 250 million gallons per day.
The issue at the other end of the process is the loss of potential
value of larval plankton. Jenkins studied possibilities for water
intake, or entrainment, in a manner that spares a greater proportion
of marine life. Two alternatives, one that employs natural seabed
filtration and the use of large intake pipe networks known as
seafloor galleries, were both found to be inappropriate for the
Carlsbad site due to insufficient sediment cover over the bedrock
along that section of the coast. The project's environmental impact
report determined that continuing to use the power station's
existing intake and discharge pipes would cause the least ecological
damage.
At the same time that water-intake methods are being refined,
Jenkins is also involved in assessing the suitability of
compensatory measures that could be made at locations other than the
Encina Power Station. The Coastal Commission's price for
greenlighting Posiedon's Carlsbad project will likely include a
condition that Poseidon restore at least 37 acres of wetland
elsewhere in San Diego County. Jenkins is advising the company on
where and how wetland restoration projects might be most effective.
Though the majority of the expertise Jenkins and Graham have brought
to the table has been for the benefit of a client, Jenkins said a
broader benefit has come in the development of more sophisticated
coastal transport models that have application to pollution
dispersion and beach erosion prediction in addition to desalination
analysis. Jenkins added that as California moves into an era of
desalination, the work done now could be parlayed into securing future grants to the institution to advise public agencies who
are trying to prepare state residents for the impending water
crisis.
Before California implements best practices in the delivery of
desalinated water, however, Jenkins and Graham see two potential
roadblocks. Even if environmental concerns are addressed to the
Coastal Commission's satisfaction, will desalination companies
bankrupt themselves to achieve compliance? Currently, desalinated
water costs about $800 per acre foot to produce, according to
Poseidon. That's half of what it cost 10 years ago but is still
several hundred dollars more per acre foot than the cost of bringing
water from traditional sources such as the Colorado River or the
Sacramento Delta. Poseidon officials believe prices for water from
other sources will only increase, but Jenkins fears that onerous
regulations could still leave desalination economically
uncompetitive, even as the state's need intensifies.
"Projects could be stillborn," he said.
Conversely, the two also fear that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger or one
of his successors will feel pressured to pre-empt the Coastal
Commission and order desalination projects before environmental
impacts are understood. Graham sees "a significant danger" in that
but also sees dwindling traditional water supplies and rising costs
of the fuels needed to deliver water piled on top of a recession.
"Like most things in this world, they're all on collision courses," Graham said.
Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3